A Friday announcement ahead of a sunny weekend and in the middle of
the results season and school holidays is usually a good time to dribble
out some news that you don't want attracting too much attention. So
today we have the announcement by Informa that it is dumping 5 of its
training businesses for between £104-113m (contingent of future
returns), albeit with approx £41m ($65m) of this provided by Informa
with a loan at only 1% (at least for the first 2 years).
So what
are the valuation metrics behind this sale. The businesses made £14.8m
of EBITA last year on revenues of £122m, so an EV/REVS multiple of 0.9x
for a 12% margin. The exit EBITA yield of between 13-14% meanwhile
should provide a good cash flow positive enhancement for the PE buyers
(Provident - no kid!), particularly given that around 40% of the
purchase price is being funded by the 1% loan from Informa itself (OMG
how desperate are these guys!) . Even assuming a possible 100% EBITA to
operating cash flow conversion and a 30% normalised tax rate and the
exit Op FCF yield (post tax) is still a whopping 9-10%. Not bad for
Provident, although it would still need the business to be able to
generate trend growth of at least +1% pa. Perhaps Informa knows a little
more about the prospects. It certainly going to take a sizable hit on
its balance sheet as these businesses were sitting on the books at
£226m, so expect a -£22m impairment.
While markets are being
trained by financial repression to go for yield, it is good to see that
returns are still defined by growth and risk. Informa, for whatever
reason, has now decided to kick a low growth/quality business out of the
door and take the earnings dilution hit because it understands the
valuation issues. One has to wonder however given the stalled organic
growth across the growth how many more such businesses may remain in the
portfolio and whether the valuation for the group as a whole should be
parameterised by its ability to deliver on this implied growth.
Without comment or recommendation is some possible pertinent analysis of implied growth ratings.
No comments:
Post a Comment