As with every reporting season one can play the game of “spot dodgy”.
Unfortunately, the deluge of quarterly results with their more limited
disclosure can make it tough to identify some of the more sophisticated
scams. As always these can include the myriad of acquisition accounting
tricks (fair value adjustments, acquisition timings, accounting policy
adjustments, off-balance sheet manipulations etc) as well as the more
obvious ones that simply park the inconvenient expenses into a bucket
called “one-off” or “non-recurring” which are all too ongoing. Playing
around with tax provisioning and using low funding costs to re-purchase
shares to bump-up EPS growth in attempt to have this mistaken as value
creation are now old hat; everyone seems to be in on this one.
While
updating my models for the quarterly results I was reminded of another
ploy, ‘scoping’. Although hardly novel or sophisticated, it involves
simply changing the scope of the operations that you want investors to
focus on and to obscure those that may not suit. A business that
under-performed can be classified as non-core and “to be discontinued”
which under IFRS and also seemingly US GAAP can from then be reported
‘below’ the line with the revenues and other operating numbers excluded
from the main body of the P&L. Having excluded the bad stuff into
what becomes little more than a footnote in the accounts, companies can
then impress the markets with how well they are managing all the
remaining good stuff – genius! Of course, this trick is also great to
use as a way of restating down previous results where the lowered
comparatives are used to show the upward only progress in “continuing”
earnings and EPS, even when the exact opposite is occurring. As memories
are short and there are simply too many quarterly announcements for
investors and commentators to take to time to do the proper leg work,
the narrative that invariably appears in the financial newswires and
markets is the one that has been crafted by the company.
A
good example of this was with PPG’s Q1 results that were released last
Thursday (16 April). Having sold its Optical’s JV last year for a short
$2bn and re-invested most of this back into a Mexican coatings business
(Comex), there were obviously a few moving parts to take into account
when analysing the ongoing performance. It would seem understandable
therefore that the group might wish to present a review of the
underlying business performance. Unfortunately, by excluding the
operating results of the disposed optical activity while including the
acquired business fails to do this and creates a fictional scenario
where the results of part of the group are excluded into the prior and
comparative period, yet the contributions from the business acquired by
applying the disposal proceeds are included in the following periods; a
classic case of having ones cake and eating it.
Although,
the net contribution from the entire group is recognised within the
P&L, only the “continuing” operations are represented above the net
income line. As the “discontinued” contributions net off the operating
contributions of these businesses with any impairment write-down or
gains, these often do not provide a representative picture of their
underlying performance unless you want to route around in the notes to
the accounts. Unsurprisingly, not many investors will bother to do this,
preferring to rely on the group’s analysis of “continuing” activities
instead. As PPG booked a gross disposal gain of $1.5bn in its Q1 FY14
(approx. $915m net), the US GAAP EPS figure for this period of $8.97,
including $7.00 for discontinued, was not particularly meaningful. The only alternative
metric provided investors meanwhile are the “continuing” figures. On
these, the Q1 FY15 results reveal a relatively steady revenue line
considering the dollar appreciation in the period, but an increasingly
impressive performance as you drop down through the P&L. Revenues
+1%, EBIT +9%, Margins +96bps, PBT +16% and EPS +18%. Clearly some great
cost management at work and assisted by debt refinancing and share
buybacks? Wrong, think again! Although the contribution from
acquisitions has not been broken out from these figures we can see what
has been excluded from the comparatives, and re-stating these alters
substantially the perceived performances of the “continuing” results.
When
one disaggregates the Q1 FY14 “discontinued” results into their
component parts we can see that these included a non-operating disposal
gain of approx. $913m within the $985m of net income. Excluding this,
operating results included EBIT of $104m and net income of $72m, which
would have added $0.51 per share if included in an overall operating EPS
metric for the group. Sales of $247m meanwhile were completely excluded
from the group P&L.
Presenting
PPG’s Q1 FY15 adjusted results for the businesses as owned by the
shareholders, but to exclude the non-operating book gain therefore
offers a somewhat different perspective on events. Revenues are lower,
although that should not in itself be a concern. Indeed, under a more
relaxed recognition to include proforma sales from Comex, the Group
might have been able to announce a slightly better organic sales growth
than the +1% reported for the “continuing” activities. EBIT, PBT and net
income however are all down heavily on what would have been a more
accurate analysis of actual performance and notwithstanding the
refinancing and share buybacks, Q1 FY15 EPS of $2.33 ps was in fact down
by -6% YoY; somewhat less impressive that the +18% highlighted by the
company.
Saturday, 18 April 2015
Friday, 17 April 2015
Market complacency may be its undoing
Welcome to the Q1 reporting season. If you hadn’t noticed
yet, Easter came early this year (good for retailers, airlines etc) and there
is a minefield of shifting currencies and commodity prices to adjust for as
well as some decidedly mixed macro data coming out from the major trading
economies. If you’re selling out of a
Euro manufacturing base or consuming a lot of energy, then chances are that Q1
2015 is proving a relatively benign results season. For those outside of this
magic circle, then perhaps one should think beyond the share buybacks and start
applying cheap capital to leverage cost synergies through acquisitions. Fedex
buying TNT, Heinz buying Kraft Foods and Shell buying BG are all manifestations
of this process.
In a World dominated by QE and its accompanying financial
repression and currency wars however, none of this really matters. As long as
governments and central banks can sustain the illusion of endless liquidity without
flipping their currencies into free-fall and hyperinflation, real price
discovery will continue to be crowded out by the carry-trade junkies in what is
increasingly a zero sum game of beggar-thy-neighbour. Unfortunately, as with
any hard drug addiction, this is a habit that is going to prove difficult, if
not impossible for politicians to kick. The consequence of US tapering of QE has been
a rise in US dollar and fall in commodity prices as liquidity supporting these
asset classes dried up. While the latter has been supportive of domestic
consumption, the former has monkey-hammered US GDP growth expectations and with
it China, as recent March trade data highlights. In our new world order where
good news is bad and the reverse also applies, then falling growth can only
mean one thing, the spice must flow again. Forget an early US interest rate
increase and indeed brace yourselves for the taps to be opened again. With
record oil stocks and the prospects for yet more excess supply to arrive
following a possible rapprochement with Iran, why else have oil prices
rebounded against this backdrop of falling GDP expectations?
Perhaps perversely, the market’s attempt to discount such an
eventuality may be its very undoing. If asset prices remain elevated in the
anticipation that the falling GDP expectations will necessitate QE4ever-wherever,
then what is going is going to provide the catalyst and political cover for the
Fed and PBOC to defer its rate increases and possibly engage in a little surreptitious
pumping? Clearly a market dump will need to be engineered first which may well
also explain the self-interested warnings from some leading Wall Street banks
that a correction may on its way. As the
instructions say, “Rinse, repeat”.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)